Island Man

Joined

• started 138 topics
• posted 2,374 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Island Man

• 
  12

  Wasn't a letter about the NGO situation read at the Hall?

  by Apognophos in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  okay, so i've been seeing the occasional comment here and there on the forum that some jws, even elders, do not seem to have heard about the society ever being an ngo.

  am i not remembering accurately?

  back when this scandal happened (2001?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  Maybe the letter was only read in kingdom halls where publishers heard or read of the issue in the news and started question the elders about it.
• 
  25

  The expression 'need greaters'. Anyone else heard this?

  by jambon1 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  my wife gets emails from someone who is serving in another country.. he keeps on referring to brothers/sisters who are 'need greaters'.. if they are actually using this expression then i have to say that it is the stupidest 'title' that they have ever dreamed up.

  so full of their own self importance.. need greaters?..............

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  A "need greater" is a dub who has moved to serve where the need is greater (hence the derivation of the term). True story: the very first time I heard the expression was in private conversation with a brother. At the time I thought I heard "knee grater" and that the brother was cynically referring to uptight, authoritarian brothers in positions of responsibility - brothers who drive you like a slave, have you figuratively on your knees scrubbing the floor thus causing your knees to be grated.
• 
  14

  Double-life, sounds like a prison sentence....or maybe not?

  by sparrowdown in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  question: do you think the "double-lifers" have the best of both worlds?.

  just asking, because i have wondered, if i had an outlet to express my utter.

  disgust and general dissatisfaction with wt teachings and cong-life while i. was still in, ie on forums etc, maybe i would never have left.. just a thought, anyone else have any?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  The stress alone of knowing TTATT and not being able to freely talk about it causes a lot more physical issues than I would have anticipated.

  It harms your physical health? Really?
• 
  81

  What are you NOT allowed to say as a Jehovahs Witness?

  by The Quiet One in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  "one of the bible study was listening and singing the song by jason mraz titled lucky with the chorus going like this;.

  quote.

  'i'm lucky i'm in love with my best friend.. lucky to have been where i have been.. lucky to be coming home again.. lucky we're in love in every way.. lucky to have stayed where we have stayed.. lucky to be coming home someday..'.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  But the word "whore" is perfectly acceptable in the Revelation Climax Book.

  I swear to you all, the next JW I'm lucky enough to hear criticizing the use of some word is going to get a good bollocking from me! I'm going to look him/her square in the eyes and say:

  "Oh my God! Really?! Is that the new low of petty self-righteousness that we're stooping to now?! I wish you good luck in your attempt at filling the shoes of the Pharisees!"
• 
  37

  How did you feel when you got baptised? Seriously....

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so recently, several over-righteous ones in the cong were discussing "how amazing it felt when they got baptised".

  statements like "how awesome did it feel as you got raised back out of the water?!".

  or the classic "i felt so close to jehovah as i came out of the pool"!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  I've heard an ex-JW once say that he felt like someone's trophy - his bible teacher's trophy. And to make matters worse, they had to dunk him twice because the first time a tiny piece of his body didn't go all the way under. What's up with that? Is Jehovah and Jesus looking down legalistically and saying: 'Oh look his nose didn't go all the way under, so that means he's technically not baptised. That's one more to be destroyed at Armageddon, mwhaa ha ha ha!'
• 
  8

  Why we need God

  by Coded Logic in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  if there was no god we would not have an objective standard to tell the difference between red from blue.

  who would determine what is red and what is blue if there was no god?

  it would be chaos!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  But Coded Logic, how could we possibly know that the enslavement and genocide of non-believers is a good thing, if God didn't condone and command it?

  And how could we possibly know to shun our own religiously defecting sons and daughters, but for sacred writ?

  So we do need God to tell us the difference between good and bad, less our imperfect conscience should move us to omit doing the good which our imperfect heart tells us is bad.

  You see, only through revelation from a God would we ever know that shunning religous apostates is a good thing - an act of love. How are people supposed to know to do do such loving acts if there's no God to reveal to them that such acts are good?
• 
  32

  How would YOU like to die - At home with your family, or in Hospital with Strangers

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. social
  2. current

  a big decision no one wants to make, but would you have a preference?.

  and, i guess it may depend on what kind of relationship you have with your family.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  Healthcare Power of Attorney, sorry it is on google.

  And here I thought the HC stood for Hospice Care
• 
  11

  "bad blood" German TV

  by inbetween in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  http://www.ardmediathek.de/tv/reportage-dokumentation/b%c3%b6ses-blut-kehrtwende-in-der-intensivm/das-erste/video?documentid=24921128&bcastid=799280.

  for those who understand german (some parts are in english).

  basically the german public tv station aired last monday a program about the danger of blood transfusions and a needed change of habits of hospitals and doctors, also about the resistance of giovernments and blood banks, touching even on financial interests.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  Great illustration Cofty.
• 
  19

  Do Jehovah's Witnesses fulfil Matthew 24:14 ?

  by raymond frantz in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  do jehovahs witnesses fulfil matthew 24:14?.

  one of the most used verses amongst jws is matthew 24:14 .no other denomination has preached the good news of the kingdom with the intensity that witnesses have around the globe.surely this must be the actual fulfillment of matthew 24:14 ,or is it ?

  this posts considers the reason why the preaching of the news performed by jehovah's witnesses today is a false sign .let me know what you think.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  JWs are not preaching the message that the bible indicates would be preached. Let me give you 2 examples from the bible

  1. Revelation 12:17 describes christians as bearing witness to Jesus. There are other verses in Revelation which also mention christians bearing witness to Jesus. So Revelation indicates that christians would primarily be witnesses of Jesus - not witnesses of Jehovah, not Jehovah's Witnesses. The very Jehovah-centric and christ-diminishing Jehovah's Witnesses are not the christians that Revelation and other NT books speak about.

  2. The question asked by the last days ridiculers' at 2 Peter 3:4 implicitly reveals that the presence of Jesus would start in a very visible and climactic manner. It also reveals that the presence does not begin with the start of the last days, like JWs teach. If that were the case, the ridiculers, as they are living in the last days, would also be living during the presence while foolishly asking where is the presence. But Peter does not say the ridiculers are foolish for not knowing that they are actually living during the presence. Nor does Peter say they are foolish for not knowing that the presence started invisibly. Conclusion: the ridiculers' are only wrong in doubting that the presence would come. Their implicit understanding of the nature of the presence is correct. So where did these ridiculers of the last days get their understanding of the presence? Who preached to them about the presence? Was it JWs? Obviously not, because the presence JWs are teaching is different to the one that the ridiculers and Peter speak about.

  So the focus of the preaching work of JWs is off. The focus should be on Jesus - his sacrificial death and resurrection and salvation by faith in him. This is actually the most important facet of the good news of the kingdom. Because it is accurate knowledge of, and faith in, Jesus that would give someone salvation - not knowledge of, and faith, in a heavenly government. A person can have all the knowledge of the kingdom govt. and if they lack faith in Jesus they will not be saved. But a person can have all the faith in Jesus and lack knowledge of the heavenly govt. and still be saved. JWs foolishly think the good news of the kingdom is mainly about preaching about paradise earth and a heavenly govt. But it's actually about salvation and inheriting the kingdom by means of faith in Jesus. And JWs are, and always have been, teaching a false eschatology. JWs match the false prophets Jesus warned about at Luke 21:8.
• 
  33

  Psychological Effects of Color

  by RedPillPopper in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  for item #1 check out the color for trust.

  totally ironic and you know the borg chose this on purpose.. .

  http://goweloveit.info/entertainment/these-8-psychological-facts-will-help-you-understand-a-lot-more-about-life-5-is-a-game-changer/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Island Man

  Actually, according to my college art class, it's not red that is the primary color, it's fuchsia.

  I think you might have this mixed up a bit, Grreatteaher.

  Fuschia - or magenta - does not exist within the visible light spectrum. Our brains make it up because our eyes don't respond to that particular wave of the electromagentic spectrum. Magenta sits outside of the nanometers that our eyes are attuned to. It is a combination of both ends of the visible light spectrum and those ends don't meet - our brain makes the loop.

  Red is a 'primary' color.

  You, or your instructor, may have 'primary' confused with 'purity' of color.

  What are considered as the primary colors in the field of physics is actually different from what are considered as the primary colors in the field of art/decorating.